The Act Of Terrorism Is Justified - 1514 Words

Introduction For some time, terrorism has been a tactic used in this world often by many individuals and groups. By definition, the act of terrorism is intended to intimidate a civilian population, to influence the policy of a government through intimidation or coercion, in order to appease a political dilemma (N/A, What We Investigate, n.d.). To accomplish an act of terrorism, man power, supplies, and payment, and more are required. But how is it possible generate, store, and transfer a vast amount of currency to purchase everything that is needed. Assuming that terrorist don’t store every form of currency they have under a giant mattress, there has to be a way that they can transfer and save funds without being under suspicion, but how? Cost of the Deeds Not only do Terrorist have to pay for Vehicles, weapons, and explosive material; but they also have to pay for other necessary means of living expenses such as having a place to stay, transportation, and food. However, cost such as these, vary on location and how far a terrorist is from the intended target. Communication is also another important asset to have when organizing terrorist attack plots. As the years passed by technology has made it easier for communicating in long ranges to organize attack plots and scheduled meetings. Terrorist groups also have to pay for training new recruits. This involves paying and providing training camps to trainees. Depending on what type of skilled is required, such as piloting aShow MoreRelatedTerrorism Has Been Used For Centuries As A Weapon Of Change1074 Words   |  5 PagesTerrorism has been used for centuries as a weapon of change. Terrorism used to force change even altered the English language, the creation of the word assassin because of the Hashhashin’s in the 11th century and the Roman’s use of decimation changing the meaning from killing one in ten to massacring all involved. Much of early terrorism was based on nationalist or ethnic groups, which had exhausted all other options while reaching for political freedom and therefore resorted to violence. The mostRead MoreTerrorism Is Morally Unjustifiable By Stephen Nathanson1477 Words   |  6 PagesAs paradoxical as it may seem (to most), it proves difficult to condemn terrorism and have a consist ent, non-hypocritical way to judge it. Most definitions of terrorism lack the applicability of all instances of terrorism, there seems to be borderline exceptions which fall within the gray area of such definitions. Stephen Nathanson, in an effort to establish what makes terrorism wrong, bases one of his main arguments on that terrorists are thought to be dreadful because they intentionally seek innocentRead MoreMass Surveillance Is Not A Justified Method Of Governmental Intelligence Gathering1664 Words   |  7 PagesResolution: Mass surveillance is not a justified method of governmental intelligence gathering. We define the term â€Å"surveillance†, as the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime, as does Merriam - Webster’s dictionary. We will have three main contentions. First: anti-terrorism, second: cost-effective, and third: it does not affect people. Contention One: Anti-Terrorism. Mass surveillance prevents terrorism in many ways. First, Mass surveillanceRead MoreAmericas Contribution to Terrorist Attacks1006 Words   |  5 PagesCan acts of terrorist violence be morally justified? To any of us who witnessed the attacks of 9/11, or indeed any terrorist attack in recent history, this may seem an absurd question. How, we ask, could anyone justify the deaths of over 3,000 innocent civilians? While these acts are morally reprehensible, so too are the acts of the west that give rise to Islamic terrorism and the west’s military responses to terrorist acts. According to Honderich, every human being is entitled to a decent lifespanRead MoreTerrorism : Killing Innocents For Noble Causes Essay1421 Words   |  6 PagesTerrorism: Killing Innocents for Noble Causes Can you remember where you were on the fatal day of September 11, 2001? When people think of terrorism, the first thought is usually about that dreadful day. Terrorism is defined as, â€Å"Premeditated and unlawful acts in which groups or agents of some principal engage in a threatened or actual use of force against human or property targets† (p. G-23). Terrorists often uses violence or threat to advance their agenda or goal. Terrorism is very widespreadRead MoreA Brief Note On The Act Of Terrorism1688 Words   |  7 PagesAn act of terrorism. In itself, is neither moral, nor immoral - no act in itself ever is. Morality of an act is determined by the intentions of its perpetrators and by the circumstances under which it takes place. Killing is a morally neutral act, it is the intention of the killer and the circumstances under which the act takes place, that make it a crime of murder subject to a heavy punishment, an unfortunate accident , or an act of valour rewarded by a medal. In the course of warsRead MoreWhat Is Terrorism, Is It Wrong, And Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible?1530 Words   |  7 PagesIn Alison M. Jaggar’s paper â€Å"What is Terrorism, Why is it Wrong, and Could it Ever be Morally Permissible?†, she takes the topic of terrorism and tries to bring up information about it in a way to where terrorism can be discussed fairly and examined critically. Terrorism has been defined differently by various people, but many have voiced their concerns about this type of violence. Jaggar tried to develop an account (i.e., in-depth definition) of terrorism that would be consistent, precise, andRead MoreTerrorism: Is It Mala in Se or Mala Prohibita Essay688 Words   |  3 Pagesbetween legally proscribed offenses and morally proscribed offenses. Legally proscribed offenses are offenses that are wrong simply because there a formal rule keeps someone from doing them. The morally proscribed offenses are offenses that cannot be justified i n a sophisticated society. For example, legally proscribed offenses are offenses such as prostitution, and gambling and morally proscribed offenses are thing like premeditated murder and forcible rape. The State of Washington vs. Thaddius X. AndersonRead MoreIs Racial Profiling Justified?642 Words   |  3 PagesAn argument if racial profiling is justified Would you put your brother, sister mother or any other family in jail if the fit the profile of a perpetrator who committed a crime and is profiled by race or ethnicity? This same question roams around the psyche of every person on who need to solve a crime. But the bigger question in regard for racial profiling if it is justified. Racial profiling cannot be justified as it attacks the very root of society on which they are built. Two key issues centralRead MoreEthical Positions Research Paper : Torture1517 Words   |  7 Pagessome non-consenting, defenseless person; (b) the intentional, substantial curtailment of the exercise of a person s autonomy (achieved by means of (a)); (c) in general, undertaken for the purpose of breaking the victim s will. We will discuss terrorism and torture, look at arguments for and against each practice, and ethically evaluate those arguments (Lendman, 2008).. If pain is meant to break the will of the person, one must ask when we might have an interest in doing so. Certainly violating